Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 20, 101260, March 2023

Download started.

Ok

The effect of social movements on COVID-19 case increases and death in Turkey

Open AccessPublished:February 27, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101260

      Highlights

      • There is a relationship between COVID-19 cases and community movements.
      • There is a relationship between deaths from COVID-19 and social movements.
      • New strategies should be developed before epidemics occur.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      This study aimed to determine whether there is a correlation between COVID-19 cases and deaths because of COVID-19 and community movements in Turkey and to develop a strategy for future outbreaks.

      Methods

      The study's data covers COVID-19 cases and deaths between March 11, 2020, and December 16, 2021, and Turkey's Google community movements between these dates. The COVID-19 cases and deaths were obtained from Turkey's Ministry of Health COVID-19 Information Platform. Community mobility collated by Google is retail and recreation, supermarket and pharmacy, parks, public transport, workplaces visits, and residential. The data were transferred via "SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 25.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL" and statistical analysis was performed. The Spearman correlation test was used as a statistical method. In the Kruskal-Wallis Test, categorical variables were created using increases and decreases in community movements based on the baseline.

      Results

      A weak positive correlation between daily COVID-19 deaths and supermarket and pharmacy activity (r = 0.28 p < 0.01). A weak negative correlation with park activity (r = -0.23 p < 0.01). A weakly positive and significant relationship with workplace visits mobility (r = 0.10 p < 0.05). There was a weak positive significant relationship with public transport mobility (r = 0.10 p < 0.01), including a weak positive significant relationship with residential (r = 0.12 p < 0.01).

      Conclusions

      Social distancing measures (such as reducing community mobility) and educating people on viral transmission in possible epidemics will save us time developing new diagnostic tests and vaccine studies.

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      Many countries have implemented mobility restrictions to contain the pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
      • Setti M.O.
      • Tollis S.
      In-depth correlation analysis of SARS-CoV-2 effective reproduction number and mobility patterns: three groups of countries.
      Unfortunately, the COVID-19 epidemic is not over yet, new variants are emerging, and deaths from COVID-19 continue despite vaccination with newly developed vaccines.
      • Saeed U.
      • Zahid Piracha Z.
      • Uppal R.
      • Uppal R.
      SARS-CoV-2-Associated CRP, DD, FER, HBA1c, IL6, LDH, PBNP, and PCT biomarkers and high-resolution computed tomography during the first three waves of COVID-19 in Pakistan (2019-2021).
      Countries have taken measures to reduce the spread of the virus. These include mandating face masks, ensuring hand hygiene with disinfectants, physical distancing regulations, and quarantine practices.
      • Kaur S.
      • Bherwani H.
      • Gulia S.
      • Vijay R.
      • Kumar R.
      Understanding COVID-19 transmission, health impacts and mitigation: timely social distancing is the key.
      During the pandemic, the authorities have established social distancing strategies such as self-isolation, quarantine, and full quarantine.
      • Güner R.
      • Hasanoğlu I.
      • Aktaş F.
      Evaluating the efficiency of public policy measures against COVID-19.
      Studies
      • Siedner M.J.
      • Harling G.
      • Reynolds Z.
      • et al.
      Social distancing to slow the US COVID-19 epidemic: longitudinal pretest-posttest comparison group study.
      • Courtemanche C.
      • Garuccio J.
      • Le A.
      • Pinkston J.
      • Yelowitz A.
      Strong social distancing measures in the United States reduced the COVID-19 growth rate.
      • Yehya N.
      • Venkataramani A.
      • Harhay M.O.
      Statewide interventions and coronavirus disease 2019 mortality in the United States: an observational study.
      • Flaxman S.
      • Mishra S.
      • Gandy A.
      • Unwin H.
      • Mellan T.A.
      • Coupland H.
      • Ghani A.C.
      • Donnelly C.A.
      • Riley S.
      • Vollmer M.
      • Ferguson N.M.
      • Okell L.C.
      • Bhatt S.
      • et al.
      Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team
      Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.
      have shown that social distancing measures effectively reduce the increase in COVID-19 cases and reduce morbidity and mortality. As population movements accelerated the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), strict movement restrictions were introduced early in some countries, such as China, to slow the epidemic. Thus, they could control the spread of the disease more quickly.
      • Nanda R.O.
      • Nursetyo A.A.
      • Ramadona A.L.
      • et al.
      Community mobility and COVID-19 dynamics in Jakarta, Indonesia.
      In 2020, the first COVID-19 case in Turkey was seen on March 11, while the first death was on March 17.
      • Bakanlığı TC Sağlık
      In addition, most of the SARS-CoV-2 cases were seen between the dates we examined the data.
      • Ucar A.
      • Arslan S.
      • Manap H.
      • Gurkan T.
      • Calıskan M.
      • Dayioglu A.
      Türkiye’de C OVID-19 Pandemisinin Monitörizasyonu için İnteraktif ve Gerçek Zamanlı Bir Web Uygulaması: TURCOVID19.
      Sixty-three thousand eighty-two cases by April 16, 2021; It was determined that there had been 394 deaths by April 30, 2021,
      • Bakanlığı TC Sağlık
      • Ucar A.
      • Arslan S.
      • Manap H.
      • Gurkan T.
      • Calıskan M.
      • Dayioglu A.
      Türkiye’de C OVID-19 Pandemisinin Monitörizasyonu için İnteraktif ve Gerçek Zamanlı Bir Web Uygulaması: TURCOVID19.
      with the most deaths. Regretfully, the virus has yet to be eradicated and continues to exist worldwide.
      • Kaur S.
      • Bherwani H.
      • Gulia S.
      • Vijay R.
      • Kumar R.
      Understanding COVID-19 transmission, health impacts and mitigation: timely social distancing is the key.
      Post-COVID-19 countries have differed in their methods of combating the pandemic. While some countries take measures to reduce community movements during the rapid spread of the virus (such as South Korea and Turkey), measures taken in some countries are more limited (such as Sweden and Brazil). In this case, measures to minimize community mobility; It is essential to investigate the number of COVID-19 cases and its impact on deaths from COVID-19. This study aimed to determine whether there is a correlation between COVID-19 cases and deaths because of COVID-19 and community movements in Turkey and to develop a strategy for future outbreaks.

      2. Methods

      2.1 Data collection and processing

      The data covers the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in Turkey between March 11, 2020, and December 16, 2021, and Turkey's Google community movements' exact dates. The number of cases and deaths from COVID-19 was obtained from the Ministry of Health's COVID-19 Information Platform. Community mobility reported by Google is "retail and recreation" (restaurant, theme park, cafe, shopping mall, cinema, etc.), "supermarket and pharmacy" (supermarket, food store, specialty food store, and pharmacy, etc.), "parks" (national parks, public parks, marinas, dog parks, public beaches, plazas, etc.), "public transport" (bus, subway and train stations, etc.), "workplaces visits" and "residential".
      Google COVID-19 community activity reports.
      From these data, the movement tendencies of people can be determined.
      Google COVID-19 community activity reports.
      We used the region-level epidemiological dataset provided by Turkey's official website,
      • Bakanlığı TC Sağlık
      TURCOVID19,
      • Ucar A.
      • Arslan S.
      • Manap H.
      • Gurkan T.
      • Calıskan M.
      • Dayioglu A.
      Türkiye’de C OVID-19 Pandemisinin Monitörizasyonu için İnteraktif ve Gerçek Zamanlı Bir Web Uygulaması: TURCOVID19.
      and news.google.com/covid19/map. The daily changes in mobility were determined according to the reference value. The reference value is the median for the five weeks from January 3 to February 6, 2020. Change according to baseline in community movements; 40% or more shows, 20%–39.99% shows, 1%–19.99% shows, 0%-(-19.99%) shows, (−20%)-(-39.99%) shows, were converted to categorical variables with (−40%) and fewer scenes.

      2.2 Statistical analysis

      The data obtained from the study were uploaded to the computer environment via “SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 25.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL)” and statistical analysis was performed. Spearman's correlation was used as a statistical method for how two quantitative variables were related. In addition, in the Kruskal-Wallis Test, categorical variables were created using increases and decreases in community movements based on the baseline. The pos-hoc Mann Whitney-u test was used for the variables with a significant relationship due to the Kruskal Wallis test. Accepted the statistical significance standard was p < 0.05.

      3. Results

      According to the histogram and Q-Q Plots analysis, the daily number of COVID-19 cases and deaths between the specified dates does not follow the normal distribution (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4). The Spearman correlation test was selected as the simple correlation test because the dependent variables (number of cases and death) do not follow the normal distribution.
      Fig. 2
      Fig. 2Normal QQ plot of number of cases per day.
      Fig. 4
      Fig. 4Normal QQ plot of number of death per day.
      According to the Spearman correlation test results, there was a moderate positive correlation between daily COVID-19 cases and supermarket and pharmacy activity (r = 0.46 p < 0.01), a weak positive correlation with retail and recreation mobility (r = 0.17 p < 0.01), there was a weak positive significant relationship with workplace visits mobility (r = 0.22 p < 0.01), and a weak positive significant relationship with public transport mobility (r = 0.25 p < 0.01) (Table 1).
      Table 1Spearman correlation test results between daily number of COVID-19 cases and number of deaths from COVID-19 and community actions.
      Community ActionsNumber of Cases per DayNumber of Deaths per Day
      Supermarket and Pharmacyrs0.46a0.28a
      p<0.01<0.01
      Retail and Recreationrs0.17a0.02
      p<0.010.60
      Parksrs−0.07−0.23a
      p0.06<0.01
      Workplacers0.22a0.10b
      p<0.010.01
      Public Transportrs0.25a0.10a
      p<0.01<0.01
      Residentialrs−0.050.12a
      p0.19<0.01
      Abbreviations: rs: Spearman correlation coefficient; a: Correlation significant at p < 0.01; b: Correlation significant at p < 0.05 level.
      Weak positive correlation between daily COVID-19 deaths and supermarket and pharmacy activity (r = 0.28 p < 0.01); a weak negative correlation with parks activity (r = -0.23 p < 0.01); a weakly positive and significant relationship with workplace visits mobility (r = 0.10 p < 0.05); There was a weak positive significant relationship with public transport mobility (r = 0.10 p < 0.01) and a weak positive significant relationship with residential (r = 0.12 p < 0.01).
      The average number of cases and deaths in changes to the community mobility baseline are shown in Fig. 5, Fig. 6. In the Kruskal-Wallis Test, categorical variables were created using increases and decreases in community movements based on the baseline. The average number of cases was significantly higher when supermarket and pharmacy activity was 40% or more from baseline. A similar situation was found in retail and recreation, workplace, and public transport. There needs to be more consistency in the number of cases between park mobility changes. Considering housing, the number of cases decreased as mobility increased (Table 2).
      Fig. 5
      Fig. 5Community mobility changes and the average number of cases.
      Fig. 6
      Fig. 6Community mobility changes and the average number of deaths.
      Table 2The relationship between mobility changes and the average number of cases.
      Community Action CategoriesChange in Movements According to BaselineAverage number of casesp value
      Kruskal Wallis Test Note: The statistically significant difference was found between variables with the same upper letter due to post-hoc analysis.
      Supermarket and Pharmacy40% and abovec,f,g19937.20 ± 8575.5410.000
      20%–39.99%13719.72 ± 10697.181
      1%–19.99%d,e,f9560.67 ± 15815.884
      0% - (−19.99%)a,d,g12767.03 ± 10774.225
      (-20%) - (−39.99%)a,b,c2803.25 ± 1229.012
      (-40%) and lowerh3862.50 ± 1310.269
      Retail and Recreation40% and above00.000
      20%–39.99%0
      1%–19.99%a21708.46 ± 7614.962
      0% - (−19.99%)a2572.26 ± 2559.457
      (-20%) - (−39.99%)a10693.14 ± 15462.332
      (-40%) and lessa13297.82 ± 14219.409
      Parks40% and aboveb10406.97 ± 10841.1930.000
      20%–39.99%c11710.75 ± 12221.855
      1%–19.99%d10174.64 ± 8684.629
      0% - (−19.99%)a,b,c,d,e25264.47 ± 18257.004
      (-20%) - (−39.99%)e12724.19 ± 12103.977
      (-40%) and lessa4249.20 ± 4627.896
      Workplace40% and above00.000
      20%–39.99%0
      1%–19.99%b,d22640.35 ± 8748.585
      0% - (−19.99%)c,d11105.00 ± 12778.226
      (-20%) - (−39.99%)a,c17260.42 ± 15664.560
      (-40%) and lessa,b5594.84 ± 5820.582
      Public Transport40% and above00.000
      20%–39.99%b,d,m,22759.59 ± 6602.085
      1%–19.99%e7569.12 ± 5570.407
      0% - (−19.99%)a5253.33 ± 8855.989
      (-20%) - (−39.99%)a,b,c,f17377.95 ± 18383.818
      (-40%) and lessc,d8537.74 ± 9773.522
      Residential40% and above00.000
      20%–39.99%a,b3826.21 ± 3672.957
      1%–19.99%a13221.45 ± 14412.000
      0% - (−19.99%)b14621.43 ± 11560.421
      (-20%) - (−39.99%)0
      (-40%) and less0
      a Kruskal Wallis Test Note: The statistically significant difference was found between variables with the same upper letter due to post-hoc analysis.
      The results from the Kruskal Wallis test showed that the highest number of deaths was determined on days when supermarket and pharmacy activity was 40% or more compared to baseline. The highest number of deaths was determined when retail and recreation, workplace, and public transport mobility were at their highest. No consistent relationship was found between the categories of parks and residential (Table 3).
      Table 3The relationship between community mobility changes and the average number of deaths.
      Community Action CategoriesChange in Movements According to BaselineAverage Number of Deathsp value
      Kruskal Wallis Test Note: The statistically significant difference was found between variables with the same upper letter due to post-hoc analysis.
      Supermarket and Pharmacy40% and above b,d165.68 ± 75.1060.000
      20%–39.99% e141.10 ± 79.483
      1%–19.99% a,b86.11 ± 88.566
      0% - (−19.99%) a,c157.05 ± 88.454
      (-20%) - (−39.99%) c,d77.66 ± 32.930
      (-40%) and less f93.00 ± 5.657
      Retail and Recreation40% and above00.000
      20%–39.99%0
      1%–19.99% c,e177.80 ± 72.559
      0% - (−19.99%) a,b,c41.77 ± 24.869
      (-20%) - (−39.99%) a,d,e91.32 ± 67.489
      (-40%) and less b,d150.07 ± 97.332
      Parks40% and above a,b104.89 ± 96.8570.000
      20%–39.99% c110.83 ± 80.839
      1%–19.99% d133.45 ± 62.691
      0% - (−19.99%) b157.62 ± 97.173
      (-20%) - (−39.99%) a,c157.32 ± 96.044
      (-40%) and less e98.92 ± 63.418
      Workplace40% and above00.000
      20%–39.99%0
      1%–19.99% b,d181.32 ± 64.893
      0% - (−19.99%) a,b99.85 ± 79.720
      (-20%) - (−39.99%) a,c165.68 ± 99.528
      (-40%) and less c,d102.38 ± 81.378
      Public Transport40% and above00.000
      20%–39.99% c,f,g,h187.72 ± 64.052
      1%–19.99% d,e,f64.88 ± 42.530
      0% - (−19.99%) a,b,c65.02 ± 47.751
      (-20%) - (−39.99%) b,e,h147.42 ± 106.097
      (-40%) and lower a,d,g125.23 ± 90.580
      Residential40% and above00.141
      20%–39.99%95.87 ± 59.285
      1%–19.99%128.54 ± 89.805
      0% - (−19.99%)120.91 ± 95.365
      (-20%) - (−39.99%)0
      (-40%) and less0
      a Kruskal Wallis Test Note: The statistically significant difference was found between variables with the same upper letter due to post-hoc analysis.

      4. Discussion

      Severe restrictions were introduced to reduce virus-related illnesses and virus-related deaths. Consequently, assessing how regulations affect the virus's spread, hospitalizations, and deaths is crucial.
      • Miles D.K.
      • Heald A.H.
      • Stedman M.
      How fast should social restrictions be eased in England as COVID-19 vaccinations are rolled out?.
      A modeling study estimated that approximately 3.1 million deaths had been prevented in 11 countries thanks to the restrictions since the beginning of the epidemic.
      • Flaxman S.
      • Mishra S.
      • Gandy A.
      • Unwin H.
      • Mellan T.A.
      • Coupland H.
      • Ghani A.C.
      • Donnelly C.A.
      • Riley S.
      • Vollmer M.
      • Ferguson N.M.
      • Okell L.C.
      • Bhatt S.
      • et al.
      Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team
      Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.
      In a simulation model, it was shown that social distancing could reduce the rate of spread of COVID-19 as well as death rates.
      • Daghriri T.
      • Ozmen O.
      Quantifying the effects of social distancing on the spread of COVID-19.
      COVID-19 studies have shown that quarantine, contact tracing, screening, and isolation are beneficial. Estimates of modeling studies have shown that quarantining people exposed to the viral agent prevents 44%–81% of cases and 31%–63% of deaths.
      • Girum T.
      • Lentiro K.
      • Geremew M.
      • Migora B.
      • Shewamare S.
      Global strategies and effectiveness for COVID-19 prevention through contact tracing, screening, quarantine, and isolation: a systematic review.
      In a study conducted in the United States, a 3% increase in the intensity of social distance caused a 1% increase in the number of cases; On the other hand, an 11% increase in social distance intensity also increased the number of deaths by 1%.
      • Besley T.
      • Dray S.
      Pandemic responsiveness: evidence from social distancing and lockdown policy during COVID-19.
      Similar to the literature, in our study, an increase in cases and death were detected in cases where the social distance rule could not be applied. The most significant association for both cases and death was with supermarkets and pharmacies (r:0.46 and r:0.28, respectively). Then, as a solution to this situation in Turkey, strict restrictions were imposed on the population over 65, and the authorities met their market and drug needs.
      It has been seen that practicing and increasing social distancing has led to a considerable decrease in the spread of infection and deaths. It has been shown that infection rates are significantly reduced when social distancing is implemented between 80% and 100%.
      • Daghriri T.
      • Ozmen O.
      Quantifying the effects of social distancing on the spread of COVID-19.
      When social distancing is 0%, the death rate is much higher as COVID-19 more quickly. The optimal level of social distancing intervention was at least 80% for a minimal spread of infection and deaths.
      • Daghriri T.
      • Ozmen O.
      Quantifying the effects of social distancing on the spread of COVID-19.
      One study reported the total number of COVID-19 cases after the introduction of social distancing measures; A decrease of approximately 1,600 cases occurred after a week, 56,000 cases after two weeks, and 621,000 cases after three weeks.
      • Siedner M.J.
      • Harling G.
      • Reynolds Z.
      • et al.
      Social distancing to slow the US COVID-19 epidemic: longitudinal pretest-posttest comparison group study.
      In another study, the increase in COVID-19 cases decreased statistically (p < 0:01) after social distancing restrictions. 4.5% after 6–11 days, 5.9% after 11–15 days, and 8.6% after 16–21 days.
      • Courtemanche C.
      • Garuccio J.
      • Le A.
      • Pinkston J.
      • Yelowitz A.
      Strong social distancing measures in the United States reduced the COVID-19 growth rate.
      The oldest 20% of the population accounted for about 15% of cases, unfortunately, about 90% of deaths.
      • Miles D.K.
      • Heald A.H.
      • Stedman M.
      How fast should social restrictions be eased in England as COVID-19 vaccinations are rolled out?.
      Each day school closures were delayed, the risk of death from COVID-19 increased by 5%–6%.
      • Yehya N.
      • Venkataramani A.
      • Harhay M.O.
      Statewide interventions and coronavirus disease 2019 mortality in the United States: an observational study.
      These two situations should be taken into account when determining the policy. In Turkey, schools were suspended as of March 16, 2020. Due to the holiday of schools, school mobility has decreased, but it has caused an increase, especially in residential mobility. Increased indoor mobility may be related to the increase in cases and deaths.
      A change point analysis with a Bayesian probability approach to measuring the effectiveness of the restrictions imposed due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in eight countries.
      • Kaur S.
      • Bherwani H.
      • Gulia S.
      • Vijay R.
      • Kumar R.
      Understanding COVID-19 transmission, health impacts and mitigation: timely social distancing is the key.
      Countries that are late initiating measures have needed help to control the increase in cases.
      • Kaur S.
      • Bherwani H.
      • Gulia S.
      • Vijay R.
      • Kumar R.
      Understanding COVID-19 transmission, health impacts and mitigation: timely social distancing is the key.
      In a study covering 27 European countries where social distancing policies affected the spread of the disease, the most significant reductions were in mandatory home quarantine, followed by the closure of businesses and schools.
      • Woskie L.R.
      • Hennessy J.
      • Espinosa V.
      • et al.
      Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: insights from Spring 2020.
      A study conducted in Taiwan found that intra-city travel restrictions were more effective in epidemic control than inter-city travel restrictions.
      • Chang M.C.
      • Kahn R.
      • Li Y.A.
      • Lee C.S.
      • Buckee C.O.
      • Chang H.H.
      Variation in human mobility and its impact on the risk of future COVID-19 outbreaks in Taiwan.
      A web-based viral reproduction prediction application developed in Malaysia has shown a significant increase in the number of people with the disease after the events in which many people participate in closed areas.
      • Herng L.C.
      • Singh S.
      • Sundram B.M.
      • et al.
      The effects of super spreading events and movement control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia.
      In a study conducted in Indonesia, the most significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 cases was seen in the pharmacy and grocery sector, with 4.12%.
      • Rahman M.M.
      • Thill J.C.
      Associations between COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures and human mobility: longitudinal evidence from 86 countries.
      A large-scale study with data from 86 countries has shown that implementing lockdowns and reducing population mobility in workplaces, public transport, and retail-recreation sectors is very effective in preventing the spread of the epidemic.
      • Rahman M.M.
      • Thill J.C.
      Associations between COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures and human mobility: longitudinal evidence from 86 countries.
      In Turkey, after the Ramadan Feast at the end of May 2020, housing mobility decreased, and other activities increased, but cases and deaths remained relatively stable. The fact that the increase in the number of cases and deaths was less than expected may have resulted from the mandatory mask application.
      According to Durmus et al.,
      • Durmuş H.
      • Gökler M.E.
      • Metintaş S.
      The effectiveness of community-based social distancing for mitigating the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey.
      social distancing measures have reduced human mobility, and the effective reproduction number of COVID-19 has decreased significantly, preventing many people from becoming infected. Many factors affect the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths (screenings, contact tracing, social distance measures, vaccination studies, etc.). Our study determined that the change in community movements affected COVID-19 cases and deaths. Cases and deaths from COVID-19 increase, especially with indoor and public transport, and decrease with outdoor mobility.

      5. Conclusions

      Screening, contact tracing, quarantine, and isolation measures effectively prevent COVID-19 when applied together; adding vaccines to these measures after they were developed increased the effectiveness of epidemic management. Social distancing measures (such as reducing community mobility) and training on the agent and transmission routes in possible epidemics will save us time developing new diagnostic tests and vaccine studies. In our study, the mobility variables were insufficient to predict the number of cases and deaths. Also, some mobility categories may be interrelated (for example, a curfew can increase residential mobility while reducing park and outdoor mobility). However, we think that early and comprehensive social distancing practices and restriction of community movements are feasible and necessary to reduce COVID-19 cases and deaths.

      Funding/support

      This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

      Author statement

      Conceptualization: MAG, OH.
      Data curation: MAG, OH.
      Formal analysis: MAG, OH.
      Funding acquisition: None.
      Methodology: MAG, OH.
      Visualization: MAG, OH.
      Writing - original draft: MAG, OH.
      Writing - review & editing: MAG, OH.

      Ethical approval statement

      This study was approved by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health COVID-19 Scientific Research Evaluation Commission (Approval Number: 2021-12-17T14-30-48).

      Declaration of competing interest

      The author(s) received no financial support for this article's research, authorship, and/or publication. The authors have no conflict of interest associated with the material presented in this paper to declare.

      Acknowledgments

      None.

      References

        • Setti M.O.
        • Tollis S.
        In-depth correlation analysis of SARS-CoV-2 effective reproduction number and mobility patterns: three groups of countries.
        J Prev Med Public Health. 2022; 55: 134-143
        • Saeed U.
        • Zahid Piracha Z.
        • Uppal R.
        • Uppal R.
        SARS-CoV-2-Associated CRP, DD, FER, HBA1c, IL6, LDH, PBNP, and PCT biomarkers and high-resolution computed tomography during the first three waves of COVID-19 in Pakistan (2019-2021).
        Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2022; 15e119590
        • Kaur S.
        • Bherwani H.
        • Gulia S.
        • Vijay R.
        • Kumar R.
        Understanding COVID-19 transmission, health impacts and mitigation: timely social distancing is the key.
        Environ Dev Sustain. 2021; 23: 6681-6697
        • Güner R.
        • Hasanoğlu I.
        • Aktaş F.
        Evaluating the efficiency of public policy measures against COVID-19.
        Turk J Med Sci. 2021; 51: 3229-3237
        • Siedner M.J.
        • Harling G.
        • Reynolds Z.
        • et al.
        Social distancing to slow the US COVID-19 epidemic: longitudinal pretest-posttest comparison group study.
        PLoS Med. 2020; 17e1003244
        • Courtemanche C.
        • Garuccio J.
        • Le A.
        • Pinkston J.
        • Yelowitz A.
        Strong social distancing measures in the United States reduced the COVID-19 growth rate.
        Health Aff. 2020; 39: 1237-1246
        • Yehya N.
        • Venkataramani A.
        • Harhay M.O.
        Statewide interventions and coronavirus disease 2019 mortality in the United States: an observational study.
        Clin Infect Dis: Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2021; 73: e1863-e1869
        • Flaxman S.
        • Mishra S.
        • Gandy A.
        • Unwin H.
        • Mellan T.A.
        • Coupland H.
        • Ghani A.C.
        • Donnelly C.A.
        • Riley S.
        • Vollmer M.
        • Ferguson N.M.
        • Okell L.C.
        • Bhatt S.
        • et al.
        • Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team
        Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.
        Nature. 2020; 584: 257-261
        • Nanda R.O.
        • Nursetyo A.A.
        • Ramadona A.L.
        • et al.
        Community mobility and COVID-19 dynamics in Jakarta, Indonesia.
        Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2022; 19: 6671
        • Bakanlığı TC Sağlık
        Genel Koronavirüs tablosu.
        ([Internet]. [updated 18.09.2022. Available from)
        • Ucar A.
        • Arslan S.
        • Manap H.
        • Gurkan T.
        • Calıskan M.
        • Dayioglu A.
        Türkiye’de C OVID-19 Pandemisinin Monitörizasyonu için İnteraktif ve Gerçek Zamanlı Bir Web Uygulaması: TURCOVID19.
        Anadolu Klin. 2020; 25 (Special Issue on COVID 19) (10.21673/anadoluklin.726347): 154-155https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.726347
        • Haberler Google
        Koronavirüs (COVİD-19).
        ([Internet]. [updated 18.09.2022. Available from)
      1. Google COVID-19 community activity reports.
        ([Internet]. [updated 15.01.2023. Available from)
        • Miles D.K.
        • Heald A.H.
        • Stedman M.
        How fast should social restrictions be eased in England as COVID-19 vaccinations are rolled out?.
        Int J Clin Pract. 2021; 75e14191
        • Daghriri T.
        • Ozmen O.
        Quantifying the effects of social distancing on the spread of COVID-19.
        Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2021; 18: 5566
        • Girum T.
        • Lentiro K.
        • Geremew M.
        • Migora B.
        • Shewamare S.
        Global strategies and effectiveness for COVID-19 prevention through contact tracing, screening, quarantine, and isolation: a systematic review.
        Trop Med Health. 2020; 48: 91
        • Besley T.
        • Dray S.
        Pandemic responsiveness: evidence from social distancing and lockdown policy during COVID-19.
        PLoS One. 2022; 17e0267611
        • Woskie L.R.
        • Hennessy J.
        • Espinosa V.
        • et al.
        Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: insights from Spring 2020.
        PLoS One. 2021; 16e0253071https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253071
        • Chang M.C.
        • Kahn R.
        • Li Y.A.
        • Lee C.S.
        • Buckee C.O.
        • Chang H.H.
        Variation in human mobility and its impact on the risk of future COVID-19 outbreaks in Taiwan.
        BMC Publ Health. 2021; 21: 1-10
        • Herng L.C.
        • Singh S.
        • Sundram B.M.
        • et al.
        The effects of super spreading events and movement control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia.
        Sci Rep. 2022; 12: 1-14
        • Rahman M.M.
        • Thill J.C.
        Associations between COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures and human mobility: longitudinal evidence from 86 countries.
        Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2022; 19: 7317
        • Durmuş H.
        • Gökler M.E.
        • Metintaş S.
        The effectiveness of community-based social distancing for mitigating the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey.
        J Prev Med Public Health. 2020; 53: 397-404