Advertisement
Original article| Volume 21, 101263, May 2023

Quality of female sterilization counseling in India: A method information index analysis

Open AccessPublished:March 14, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101263

      Abstract

      Problem considered

      This study assesses the Method Information Index (MII) for sterilization use and its correlates in India.

      Methods

      National Family Health Survey-5 data (2019–21) was considered for analysis. The sample of women aged 15–49 who adopted sterilization in the last five years preceding the survey (n = 42,480) was included. Binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the adjusted association of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics with MII. Stata (v16.0) was used for the analysis with a 5% significance level.

      Results

      Compared to women who undergone sterilization in a government hospital, the women who had sterilization in a Camp/Mobile clinic/other public facility, Primary health centre/Sub-centre/Urban health post/Government dispensary, and Community Health Centre had respectively, 36% (OR = 0.64, CI = 0.56–0.73), 15% (OR = 0.85, CI = 0.79–0.90) and 14% (OR = 0.86, CI = 0.82–0.91) lower odds of receiving method information.

      Conclusion

      The MII for sterilization was found inadequate, with less than half of the sterilized women being informed about (a) other methods, (b) possible side effects, and (c) side-effects management before adopting the method. Sterilization counseling is positively associated with higher education, exposure to FP messages, social backwardness, urban residence, and services from a government hospital. Regular sensitization of health providers, especially in the lower order health facilities, on the importance of reproductive rights and informed choice seems pertinent. Improved sterilization counseling will also address women's reproductive health and rights and help attain SDG 3.

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      Female sterilization consisting of three-fourths of the modern contraceptive method users in 2019–21 continues to lead the Indian family planning program. Socioeconomic conditions
      • Oliveira IT de
      • Dias J.G.
      • Padmadas S.S.
      Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact.
      and the ongoing family planning program
      • Singh P.
      • Singh K.K.
      • Singh P.
      Factors explaining the dominion status of female sterilization in India over the past two decades (1992-2016): a multilevel study.
      largely determine the hegemony of sterilization. However, the quality of female sterilization services has been far from satisfactory
      • Achyut P.
      • Nanda P.
      • Khan N.
      • Verma R.
      Quality of Care in Provision of Female Sterilization in Bihar: A Summary Report.
      ,
      • Singh R.
      • Neogi S.B.
      • Hazra A.
      • et al.
      Utilization of maternal health services and its determinants: a cross-sectional study among women in rural Uttar Pradesh, India.
      and has inadequately informed choices.
      • Kendall T.
      • Albert C.
      Experiences of coercion to sterilize and forced sterilization among women living with HIV in Latin America.
      ,
      • Pradhan M.R.
      • Patel S.K.
      • Saraf A.A.
      Informed choice in modern contraceptive method use: pattern and predictors among young women in India.
      Most women seek sterilization services from public health facilities.
      International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF
      National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India.
      Nevertheless, the quality of sterilization care is often poorer in public health facilities
      • Mathur M.
      • Goyal R.
      • Mathur N.
      Quality assessment of family planning sterilization services at health care facilities: case record audit.
      and is linked with facility readiness and the socioeconomic characteristics of the clients.
      • Joseph K.J.V.
      • Mozumdar A.
      • Lhungdim H.
      • Acharya R.
      Quality of care in sterilization services at the public health facilities in India: a multilevel analysis.
      Sterilization acceptance is again not uniform and negatively skewed towards the socioeconomically weaker women.
      • Singh P.
      • Singh K.K.
      • Singh P.
      Factors explaining the dominion status of female sterilization in India over the past two decades (1992-2016): a multilevel study.
      ,
      • Bali S.
      • Yadav K.
      • Alok Y.
      A study of the status of provision of sterilisation services in India.
      ,
      • Pradhan M.R.
      • Ram U.
      Female sterilization and ethical issues: the Indian experience.
      Moreover, women from socioeconomically weaker sections usually have lower health care autonomy,
      International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF
      National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India.
      which rationalizes regular assessment of the quality of sterilization services in the country.
      Informed choice is considered a fundamental human right
      • Huezo C.
      • Diaz S.
      Quality of care in family planning: clients' rights and providers' needs.
      and enhances women's confidence and commitment to contraceptive use. Appropriate counseling with instructions women can understand ensures their right to information and reproductive self-determination.
      • Hardee K.
      • Kumar J.
      • Newman K.
      • et al.
      Voluntary, human rights–based family planning: a conceptual framework.
      Target 3.7 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) also demands universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services, including family planning, information and education, and the integration of reproductive health into national strategies and programs by 2030.
      • Desa U.N.
      Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
      This commitment requires monitoring key family planning indicators, including the percentages of women making an informed contraceptive choice.
      The Method Information Index (MII) was adopted as an indicator of informed choice by the Family Planning 2020 initiative
      • Family F.P.
      Planning 2020 Core Indicators. FP2020 Partnersh Action 2012-2013.
      and is increasingly used to address the concepts of counseling and informed choice.
      • Jain A.K.
      Information about methods received by contraceptive users in India.
      ,
      • Chang K.T.
      • Mukanu M.
      • Bellows B.
      • et al.
      Evaluating quality of contraceptive counseling: an analysis of the Method Information Index.
      The MII can be considered as one way to measure the “information given to clients” component of the well-established quality of care framework of Judith Bruce.
      • Bruce J.
      Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework.
      The MII summarizes the adequacy of information provided by the service provider to the women when receiving family planning (FP) services. It serves as a proxy for the quality of counseling and reflects the extent to which women are informed about side effects and alternate methods. The client's perspective is helpful for service providers and programmers to understand the user's perception of service quality,
      • Andaleeb S.S.
      Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country.
      though prone to measurement error and might differ from the provider's perspective.
      • Petersen M.B.H.
      Measuring patient satisfaction: collecting useful data.
      This study assesses the MII for sterilization use and its correlates among women in India.

      2. Data and methods

      2.1 Data

      The study used data from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), 2019–21. The NFHS-5 is a nationally representative survey of 636699 households that provides information for various monitoring and impact evaluation indicators of health, nutrition, and women's empowerment, including the family planning method used. The NFHS-5 is a stratified two-stage sample with a 98% response rate. The primary sampling units, i.e., the survey villages in rural areas and census enumeration blocks in urban areas, were selected using probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling. Trained research investigators gathered the data using computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). Verbal/written informed consent was obtained from the participants. Only those respondents who gave voluntary consent were interviewed. The published survey report provides a more detailed description of the survey design, questionnaire, quality control measures, and survey management information.
      International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF
      National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India.
      The present analysis was conducted for women aged 15–49 who adopted sterilization in the last five years preceding the survey (n = 42,480).

      2.2 Outcome variable

      The outcome variable of this study is the MII for female sterilization. The MII consists of three questions: 1. Were you informed about other methods? 2. Were you informed about side effects? 3. Were you told what to do if you experienced side effects? The reported value is the percentage of women who responded “yes” to all three questions.

      2.3 Predictor variables

      The predictor variables considered for the analysis were: source of sterilization (government hospital, community health centers (CHC), primary health center-PHC/sub-center-SC/urban health post-UHP/government dispensary, camp/mobile clinic/other public facilities, private hospital, other private facilities), age of the women in years (15–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49), years of schooling (no schooling, up to nine years, ten and more years), number of surviving son (Nil, at least have one son), social group (scheduled caste-SC, scheduled tribe-ST, other backward classes-OBC, Non-SC/ST/OBC), religion (Hindu, Muslim, Others), number of household members (<5, ≥ 5) wealth quintile (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest), place of residence (urban, rural) and region (north, central, east, northeast, west, south). In India, public sector healthcare facilities are organised into three levels: primary (Subcentres, PHCs, UHP), secondary (CHCs, taluka hospitals), and tertiary (District hospital, medical colleges and teaching hospitals). They differ in terms of staff composition and service delivery; thus we have categorized them accordingly for this analysis.

      2.4 Statistical analysis

      Bivariate analysis was used to assess the socioeconomic and demographic differentials in the MII for female sterilization. Binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the adjusted association of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics with MII. The predictor variables included in the regression analysis were finalized after checking multicollinearity through Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) method (Table 1). Sample weights were used to adjust the non-response. Stata (V 16) was used for analyses, and the results were reported at a five percent significance level with two-tailed alternate hypothesis.
      Table 1Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for the predictor variables.
      VariablesVIF1/VIF
      Wealth index1.610.620114
      Year of schooling1.440.695811
      Place of residence1.260.794301
      Age1.150.869848
      Exposed to FP messages1.130.881769
      Region1.120.894347
      Social group1.100.911196
      Number of household members1.070.932109
      Number of living son1.040.960865
      Religion1.020.97766
      Mean VIF1.19

      3. Results

      3.1 Socioeconomic and demographic differentials in MII for female sterilization

      Of the total sterilized women, nearly two-thirds (65%) were told about other possible methods of contraception, about three-fifths (59%) were told about its side effects, and about a half (51%) were told about side-effect management before accepting the method (Table 2). Only 46% of the sterilization acceptors were informed about all three indicators mentioned above. Half of the women receiving sterilization from a government hospital were informed about all three indicators. The corresponding figures were 46%, 45%, 44%, 39%, and 38%, respectively, for those who received the method from a PHC/SC/UHP/Government dispensary, private hospital, CHC, Camp/Mobile clinic/other public facilities, and Other private facilities, respectively. The MII was 47% for the women aged 25–39 years, 44% for women aged 15–24 years, 42% for those aged 40–44 years, and 33% for women aged 45–49 years. With increasing years of schooling, the method information had increased, i.e., from 40% for women with no schooling to 51% for women with ten or more years of schooling. A higher percentage of the women (51%) exposed to family planning messages were informed about the method than their counterparts without mass media exposure (38%).
      Table 2Percentage
      Using sampling weight.
      of women aged 15–49 who undergone sterilization during last five years preceding the survey by method information index and background characteristics, India, 2019-21.
      Background CharacteristicsTotal Number of womenTold about other methodsTold about side effectsTold about side-effect managementMethod Information Index (MII)
      Source of sterilization
      Government hospital15,30868.362.855.250.2
      CHC11,08763.356.847.943.8
      PHC/SC/UHP/Government dispensary521164.057.950.645.9
      Camp/Mobile clinic/other public facility105764.954.244.638.7
      Private hospital871564.657.249.644.9
      Other private facilities77658.252.643.937.7
      Age (years)
      15–24558963.757.049.044.2
      25–2916,93966.159.451.546.7
      30–3411,88366.659.251.647.2
      35–39563364.260.251.846.7
      40–44166158.455.045.341.5
      45–4977445.945.939.133.2
      Years of schooling
      None10,49259.654.045.340.5
      <10 years of schooling17,29164.558.250.245.2
      10+ years of schooling14,69769.462.755.451.1
      Number of living son
      No392365.958.851.848.1
      At least one3855764.958.750.745.9
      Exposed to FP messages
      No16,16856.350.64337.6
      Yes2631270.463.755.551.3
      Religion
      Hindu37,19665.358.950.846.1
      Others528462.757.350.245.7
      Social group
      Non-SC/ST/OBC764961.855.647.642.8
      SC10,35564.657.649.444.6
      ST447165.762.455.950.2
      OBC19,62566.6605247.6
      Don't know38048.739.429.426.4
      Number of household members
      <511,74064.85951.546.8
      5+30,74065.158.650.545.8
      Wealth quintile
      Poorest960060.455.746.841.4
      Poorer932261.855.647.642.8
      Middle944067.359.35248
      Richer828967.66153.749.1
      Richest582970.264.356.351.8
      Type of place of residence
      Urban11,459686254.249.8
      Rural31,02163.957.549.544.7
      Region
      South12,90268.159.453.750.1
      North455165.86149.444.2
      Central765772.868.658.554.3
      East10,43157.650.742.837.7
      Northeast43368.665.858.153.9
      West650560.956.349.242.8
      Total424806558.750.846.1
      a Using sampling weight.
      Among the social groups, the women from the ST community (50%) had the highest percentage with method information, followed by OBC (48%), SC (47%), and Non-SC/ST/OBC (43%). With increasing wealth status, the method information had also increased. For example- 41% of the sterilization acceptors from the poorest households were informed about all three indicators, and the percentages increased to 52% for the women from households of the richest category. Every second sterilization user from the urban area was informed about the method compared with 45% of their rural counterparts. Fifty-four percent of the women from the central and north-eastern regions were informed about the method. The corresponding figures were 50% for women from the southern region, 44% for the north, 43% for the west, and 38% for those from the eastern region. The method information varied considerably among states and Union Territories (UT) of India (Fig. 1). Among the bigger states, 73% of the sterilization users from Tamil Nadu were informed about the method compared to a mere 20% of the users from Andhra Pradesh. Half of the sterilization acceptors in 18 out of 36 state/UTs were not informed about all three indicators of MII.
      Fig. 1
      Fig. 1Method information index by state/Union Territories, India, 2019-21.

      3.2 Determinants of female sterilization counseling

      Table 3 presents the adjusted odds ratio of MII for female sterilization. Compared to women who undergone sterilization in a government hospital, the women who had sterilization in Other private facilities, Camp/Mobile clinic/other public facility, Private hospital, PHC/SC/UHP/Government dispensary, and CHC had respectively 37% (OR = 0.63, CI = 0.54–0.73), 36% (OR = 0.64, CI = 0.56–0.73), 24% (OR = 0.76, CI = 0.72–0.80), 15% (OR = 0.85, CI = 0.79–0.90) and 14% (OR = 0.86, CI = 0.82–0.91) lower odds of receiving method information … With increasing years of schooling, women had higher odds (OR = 1.10, CI = 1.06–1.13) of receiving method information. Women not exposed to family planning messages had 62% (OR = 0.62, CI = 0.60–0.65) lower odds of receiving method information than those exposed. Compared to Non-SC/ST/OBC women, ST, OBC and SC women had respectively 55% (OR = 1.55, CI = 1.43–1.68), 20% (OR = 1.20, CI = 1.13–1.27) and 14% (OR = 1.14, CI = 1.07–1.21) more chance of receiving method information. The likelihood of receiving method information was 16% (OR = 1.16, CI = 1.06–1.28) higher among women from the richest household compared to their counterparts from the poorest households. Rural women were less likely (OR = 0.94, CI = 0.89–0.98) to receive the method information than their urban counterparts. Compared to southern region, women of central and north-eastern region had respectively 35% (OR = 1.34, CI = 1.26–1.43) and 32% (OR = 1.31, CI = 1.07–1.60) higher odds whereas women from the east and west region both had 23% (OR = 0.77, CI = 0.73–0.83) and northern region had 13% (OR = 0.87, CI = 0.81–0.94) lower odds of receiving method information.
      Table 3Adjusted odds ratio
      Using sampling weight.
      of method information index by background characteristics of women aged 15–49 who undergone sterilization during last five years preceding the survey, India, 2019-21.
      Background CharacteristicsMethod Information Index
      Adjusted odds ratio (AOR)95% CI
      Source of sterilization
      Government hospital ®1
      CHC0.86***[0.82–0.91]
      PHC/SC/UHP/Government dispensary0.85***[0.79–0.90]
      Camp/Mobile clinic/other public facility0.64***[0.56–0.73]
      Private hospital0.76***[0.72–0.80]
      Other private facilities0.63***[0.54–0.73]
      Age in years1 (p = 0.652)[0.98–1.01]
      Years of schooling1.10***[1.06–1.13]
      Number of living son
      At least one ®1
      No1.05 (p = 0.132)[0.98–1.13]
      Exposed to FP messages
      Yes ®1
      No0.62***[0.60–0.65]
      Religion
      Hindu ®1
      Others1.04 (p = 0.251)[0.97–1.10]
      Social group
      Non-SC/ST/OBC ®1
      SC1.14***[1.07–1.21]
      ST1.55***[1.43–1.68]
      OBC1.20***[1.13–1.27]
      Don't know0.54***[0.42–0.68]
      Number of household members0.99 (p = 0.556)[0.94–1.03]
      Wealth quintile
      Poorest ®1
      Poorer0.95 (p = 0.136)[0.90–1.01]
      Middle1.06 (p = 0.082)[0.99–1.14]
      Richer1.07 (p = 0.097)[0.99–1.15]
      Richest1.16**[1.06–1.28]
      Type of place of residence
      Urban ®1
      Rural0.94* (p = 0.010)[0.89–0.98]
      Region
      South ®1
      North0.87***[0.81–0.94]
      Central1.34***[1.26–1.43]
      East0.77***[0.72–0.82]
      Northeast1.31** (p = 0.008)[1.07–1.60]
      West0.77***[0.73–0.83]
      *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ® “Reference category”.
      a Using sampling weight.

      4. Discussion

      The MII for sterilization is inadequate, with less than half of the sterilized women being informed about (a) other methods, (b) possible side effects, and (c) side-effects management before adopting the method. Sterilization counseling is positively associated with higher education, exposure to FP messages, social backwardness, urban residence, and services from a government hospital. The result conforms with earlier studies that, although the most adopted method, informed choice is inadequate along with wide variation in the provision of information.
      • Pradhan M.R.
      • Patel S.K.
      • Saraf A.A.
      Informed choice in modern contraceptive method use: pattern and predictors among young women in India.
      ,
      • Koenig M.A.
      • Foo G.H.C.
      • Joshi K.
      Quality of care within the Indian family welfare programme: a review of recent evidence.
      ,
      • Jadhav A.
      • Vala-Haynes E.
      Informed choice and female sterilization in South Asia and Latin America.
      Among the public health facilities, the quality of sterilization counseling deteriorates among the lower order facilities, and the women sterilized in camps/mobile clinics are least likely to receive method information. This result conforms to an earlier study.
      • Sharma D.C.
      India's sterilisation scandal.
      It prompts the need for improving service delivery in the health facilities at the bottom level to reinforce the credibility of the public health care delivery system. The study found that educated women had higher odds of a high score on the index, indicating that not enough health care providers spend time informing non-literate women about different aspects of sterilization. This agrees with a past study that reveals the quality of sterilization counseling varies and that there are specific groups of more affected women.
      • Jadhav A.
      • Vala-Haynes E.
      Informed choice and female sterilization in South Asia and Latin America.
      Another study also found higher chances of educated women having informed choices than their uneducated counterparts in India and abroad.
      • Jain A.K.
      Examining progress and equity in information received by women using a modern method in 25 developing countries.
      In conformity to an earlier study that found targeted family planning messages/interventions enhance informed method choice,
      • Modugu H.R.
      • Panda R.
      • Mind C.
      Entertainment education shows for increased uptake of family planning services and improved health seeking behavior in rural India.
      this study reveals that women exposed to FP messages have received better sterilization counseling.
      The study found that sterilization counseling is better among socially backward communities. Women from backward communities typically have less control over their healthcare
      International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF
      National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India.
      and are more likely to be less educated, which limits their understanding of the service quality and expectations from the service providers; therefore, they reported to have received the method information. Additionally, they are more likely to have obtained the compensation money and undergone sterilization in a public facility, which may have influenced their reporting. The MII was lower for rural women than their urban counterparts. An earlier study also found higher odds of receiving low-quality care in sterilization services among rural women than urban women.
      • Joseph K.J.V.
      • Mozumdar A.
      • Lhungdim H.
      • Acharya R.
      Quality of care in sterilization services at the public health facilities in India: a multilevel analysis.
      Women from the eastern and western regions are found to be least counseled, albeit wide regional variation in the quality of sterilization counseling. According to earlier research, women from the western region have less autonomy in choosing family planning methods,
      • Singh S.K.
      • Sharma B.
      • Vishwakarma D.
      • Yadav G.
      • Srivastava S.
      • Maharana B.
      Women's empowerment and use of contraception in India: macro and micro perspectives emerging from NFHS-4 (2015–16).
      which is primarily up to their spouses.
      • Ghule M.
      • Raj A.
      • Palaye P.
      • et al.
      This limits women's access to high-quality counseling. Another study in the eastern state of Odisha also found low adherence to essential procedures at public health facilities during female sterilization service provision, often due to inadequate human resources and infrastructure.
      • Srivastava A.
      • Chhibber G.
      • Bhatnagar N.
      • et al.
      Effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention to increase adherence to key practices during female sterilization services in Chhattisgarh and Odisha states of India.
      Sterilization without informed choice is associated with post-use health problems
      • Pradhan M.R.
      • Ram U.
      Female sterilization and ethical issues: the Indian experience.
      and regret, especially for women without a son and child loss. Female sterilization at a young age may result in low condom use, which is crucial for preventing RTI/STI and HIV/AIDS, particularly among young women who continue to be susceptible in traditional settings like India. Women's decision to undergo female sterilization has been proven to be influenced by a lack of knowledge or misinformation about spacing procedures and fewer opportunities to use modern spacing methods.
      • Pandey A.
      • Sahu D.
      • Bakkali T.
      • et al.
      Estimate of HIV prevalence and number of people living with HIV in India 2008–2009.
      Also, given a choice, most women opt for modern spacing methods.
      • Baveja R.
      • Buckshee K.
      • Das K.
      • et al.
      Evaluating contraceptive choice through the method-mix approach: an Indian council of medical research (ICMR) task force study.
      Our results suggest better counseling of potential sterilization acceptors to ensure informed decision-making and to avoid possible post-use concerns.
      There are several strengths of this study. Firstly, the results are based on large-scale, nationally representative data of NFHS-5 with a robust sampling design; thus, the results are contemporary and relevant. Secondly, the results contribute to the evidence on sterilization counseling and reproductive rights violations. Thirdly, the findings are helpful for customized, targeted efforts to improve the method information among the most deprived/disadvantaged group/area. Regarding limitations, as with any cross-sectional study, causality is impossible to establish for the factors covered. The other limitation is recall bias, which might occur due to memory lapse.

      5. Conclusion

      The MII for sterilization is inadequate and varies by region and socioeconomic profile of the women in India. Poor counseling is a barrier to informed method choice and might lead to higher post-use health concerns and regret, adversely affecting women's health and welfare. Regular sensitization of health providers, especially in the lower order health facilities, on the importance of reproductive rights and informed choice seems pertinent to enhance the quality of sterilization counseling. Improved sterilization counseling will ensure informed method choice addressing reproductive health and rights of women and help attain SDG 3- ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all.

      Sources of funding

      This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

      Declaration of competing interest

      None.

      CRediT authorship contribution statement

      Manas Ranjan Pradhan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Sourav Mondal: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing. Prasanna Kumar Mudi: Data curation, Software, Writing – review & editing.

      Acknowledgements

      Not applicable.

      References

        • Oliveira IT de
        • Dias J.G.
        • Padmadas S.S.
        Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e86654https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086654
        • Singh P.
        • Singh K.K.
        • Singh P.
        Factors explaining the dominion status of female sterilization in India over the past two decades (1992-2016): a multilevel study.
        PLoS One. 2021; 16e0246530https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246530
        • Achyut P.
        • Nanda P.
        • Khan N.
        • Verma R.
        Quality of Care in Provision of Female Sterilization in Bihar: A Summary Report.
        Published online, 2014
        • Singh R.
        • Neogi S.B.
        • Hazra A.
        • et al.
        Utilization of maternal health services and its determinants: a cross-sectional study among women in rural Uttar Pradesh, India.
        J Health Popul Nutr. 2019; 38: 13https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-019-0173-5
        • Kendall T.
        • Albert C.
        Experiences of coercion to sterilize and forced sterilization among women living with HIV in Latin America.
        J Int AIDS Soc. 2015; 1819462
        • Pradhan M.R.
        • Patel S.K.
        • Saraf A.A.
        Informed choice in modern contraceptive method use: pattern and predictors among young women in India.
        J Biosoc Sci. 2020; 52: 846-859https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932019000828
        • International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF
        National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India.
        2021
        • Mathur M.
        • Goyal R.
        • Mathur N.
        Quality assessment of family planning sterilization services at health care facilities: case record audit.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11: LC07-LC09https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/24630.9793
        • Joseph K.J.V.
        • Mozumdar A.
        • Lhungdim H.
        • Acharya R.
        Quality of care in sterilization services at the public health facilities in India: a multilevel analysis.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15e0241499https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241499
        • Bali S.
        • Yadav K.
        • Alok Y.
        A study of the status of provision of sterilisation services in India.
        J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019; 8: 3297
        • Pradhan M.R.
        • Ram U.
        Female sterilization and ethical issues: the Indian experience.
        Soc Change. 2009; 39: 365-387
        • Huezo C.
        • Diaz S.
        Quality of care in family planning: clients' rights and providers' needs.
        Adv Contracept. 1993; 9: 129-139
        • Hardee K.
        • Kumar J.
        • Newman K.
        • et al.
        Voluntary, human rights–based family planning: a conceptual framework.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2014; 45: 1-18
        • Desa U.N.
        Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
        Published online, 2016
        • Family F.P.
        Planning 2020 Core Indicators. FP2020 Partnersh Action 2012-2013.
        Published online, 2020
        • Jain A.K.
        Information about methods received by contraceptive users in India.
        J Biosoc Sci. 2017; 49: 798-810
        • Chang K.T.
        • Mukanu M.
        • Bellows B.
        • et al.
        Evaluating quality of contraceptive counseling: an analysis of the Method Information Index.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2019; 50: 25-42
        • Bruce J.
        Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework.
        Stud Fam Plann. 1990; 21: 61-91
        • Andaleeb S.S.
        Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country.
        Soc Sci Med. 2001; 52: 1359-1370
        • Petersen M.B.H.
        Measuring patient satisfaction: collecting useful data.
        J Nurs Care Qual. 1988; 2: 25-35
        • Koenig M.A.
        • Foo G.H.C.
        • Joshi K.
        Quality of care within the Indian family welfare programme: a review of recent evidence.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2000; 31: 1-18
        • Jadhav A.
        • Vala-Haynes E.
        Informed choice and female sterilization in South Asia and Latin America.
        J Biosoc Sci. 2018; 50: 823-839https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932017000621
        • Sharma D.C.
        India's sterilisation scandal.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: e68-e69
        • Jain A.K.
        Examining progress and equity in information received by women using a modern method in 25 developing countries.
        Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016; 42: 131-140
        • Modugu H.R.
        • Panda R.
        • Mind C.
        Entertainment education shows for increased uptake of family planning services and improved health seeking behavior in rural India.
        Demogr India. 2018; 47: 83-99
        • Singh S.K.
        • Sharma B.
        • Vishwakarma D.
        • Yadav G.
        • Srivastava S.
        • Maharana B.
        Women's empowerment and use of contraception in India: macro and micro perspectives emerging from NFHS-4 (2015–16).
        Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019; 19: 15-23
        • Ghule M.
        • Raj A.
        • Palaye P.
        • et al.
        Barriers to Use Contraceptive Methods Among Rural Young Married Couples in Maharashtra, India: Qualitative Findings. vol. 5. Diva Enterprises Private Limited, 2015https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2015.00132.x
        • Srivastava A.
        • Chhibber G.
        • Bhatnagar N.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention to increase adherence to key practices during female sterilization services in Chhattisgarh and Odisha states of India.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15e0244088
        • Pandey A.
        • Sahu D.
        • Bakkali T.
        • et al.
        Estimate of HIV prevalence and number of people living with HIV in India 2008–2009.
        BMJ Open. 2012; 2e000926https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000926
        • Baveja R.
        • Buckshee K.
        • Das K.
        • et al.
        Evaluating contraceptive choice through the method-mix approach: an Indian council of medical research (ICMR) task force study.
        Contraception. 2000; 61: 113-119